LEARN / EXPLORE / APPLY
Guides, new ideas and supplier connections
for better material decisions.
03 / EVERYDAY QUESTIONS
A more thoughtful starting point for everyday choices.
Short explanations to help you read a label, ask better questions and understand the science.
Sunscreen choices can reduce one source of chemical pollution near reefs. Learn what Hawaii’s sunscreen rule covers, why labels can be confusing, and how clothing and shade help protect both skin and marine life.
Read the article →Nonylphenol ethoxylates help cleaning products work, but their breakdown products can harm aquatic life. Understanding what happens after a chemical goes down the drain is part of choosing a better product.
Read the article →PFAS are a large group of chemicals used for useful properties such as resisting oil and water. Many persist for a long time, and some are linked to health effects. The concern depends on the chemical and the exposure.
Read the article →Source-linked educational articles · sources checked 2026-11-02 · no product endorsements.
A claim can be accurate in a limited setting and still be easy to misunderstand. Open a term to see what it means and what to check.
These words can suggest more than a company has measured. Ask which benefit is claimed, for which part of the product, and compared with what.
What to check: Can the company name and support the benefit?
FTC ↗A plant-derived ingredient can still cause harm or an allergic reaction. Source alone does not establish safety under actual use conditions.
What to check: What ingredients are present, and what evidence supports their use?
FDA ↗USDA organic rules can apply to agricultural ingredients in cosmetics. Certification does not mean every ingredient is harmless or that the finished product is environmentally superior.
What to check: Which certification and ingredients does the claim cover?
FDA ↗The phrase does not describe a product with no chemicals. A useful claim names a particular substance that is absent instead of treating all chemicals as harmful.
What to check: Which specific ingredient is the company saying it leaves out?
FTC / eCFR ↗The claim needs support for people and the environment. It does not mean safe in every amount, by every exposure route, or for every use.
What to check: What tests, exposure conditions and product uses support the claim?
FTC / eCFR ↗The claim should explain the disposal setting and time needed for the whole item to break down. Performance in one test does not establish the same result in a landfill or ocean.
What to check: Which environment, test method and time period?
FTC / eCFR ↗The item needs the right composting conditions. A facility may reject even a certified item. It is not permission to litter or place it in a recycling bin.
What to check: Home or commercial composting—and does your local program accept it?
FTC / eCFR ↗A recycling symbol does not promise that your local program collects or processes that exact item. Acceptance can depend on its size, material and construction.
What to check: Does your local program accept this exact package?
FTC / eCFR ↗It means recovered material was used. It does not automatically make the finished item recyclable. The claim should distinguish the product from its packaging.
What to check: How much recycled material, and in which component?
FTC / eCFR ↗The claim describes where some material comes from. It does not by itself show that the item is biodegradable, compostable, recyclable or lower-impact overall.
What to check: What renewable material and percentage are used?
FTC / eCFR ↗FDA has not defined “reef safe” for sunscreen. Leaving out oxybenzone and octinoxate does not prove the full formula is harmless to marine life.
What to check: What ingredients and environmental evidence support the claim?
American Academy of Dermatology ↗A claim about intentionally added PFAS is different from a test reporting none detected. A test covers particular substances and detection limits, not necessarily every PFAS or component.
What to check: Which chemicals, components and test limits were checked?
EPA ↗FTC / eCFR ↗PFOA is one member of the PFAS group. A claim that it is absent does not establish that all other PFAS are absent.
What to check: Does the supplier address the broader PFAS group?
EPA ↗Do not read the claim as “no emissions.” Ask about the accounting boundary, direct reductions, and evidence for any carbon offsets used.
What to check: Product or company claim, for which period, using which accounting and offsets?
FTC ↗A certification can cover one attribute rather than overall safety. Check the certifier and standard, not just the design of a badge.
What to check: Who issued it, what was tested, and can you verify the listing?
FTC / eCFR ↗Based on linked U.S. agency and expert guidance. The scope of a claim matters; these explanations do not certify products.
COMPANY CLIMATE COMMITMENTS
Search company commitments, read their disclosures, and look beyond the headline goal.
3 companies found · starter coverage only
Company-stated goal
Carbon neutral across its global footprint by 2030
On-track assessment: Not assessed
Company describes a global-footprint goal, with a 75% emissions reduction aim against 2015 before balancing remaining emissions.
Apple’s April 2025 announcement reported more than 60% lower global greenhouse gas emissions than in 2015. This is a dated company-reported figure, not a current independent assessment.
Progress figure: April 2025 disclosure
Independent validation and assurance coverage have not been assessed here. Inclusion is not an endorsement.
Company-stated goal
Carbon-negative ambition
On-track assessment: Not assessed
The company discusses its carbon-negative ambition in its July 2026 sustainability report announcement.
The 2026 report covers fiscal year 2025 against a 2020 baseline. A comparable emissions trend and trajectory assessment have not yet been entered into this directory.
Reporting period: fiscal year 2025
Independent validation and assurance coverage have not been assessed here. Inclusion is not an endorsement.
Company-stated goal
Net-zero value-chain emissions ambition by 2039
On-track assessment: Not assessed
Company describes near-term Scope 1, 2, and 3 targets alongside its longer-term value-chain ambition.
The company publishes a Climate Transition Action Plan. A comparable emissions trend and trajectory assessment have not yet been entered into this directory.
Source: company climate page; progress series not compiled
Independent validation and assurance coverage have not been assessed here. Inclusion is not an endorsement.
Compare reported absolute emissions over multiple years against a disclosed baseline and target pathway. Record Scope 1, 2, and 3 coverage, reporting boundaries, methodology changes, interim milestones, removals or offsets, and external assurance separately. Missing or incomparable evidence should remain “not assessed” rather than becoming a green rating.
Before relying on a claim, ask what it covers: the whole package, a coating, or one component. Look for a named standard, supporting documentation, and any conditions attached to the claim.
What exactly is being claimed, and where is the supporting evidence?
Use the label as a starting point for questions about fiber content, finishes, intended use, and care. A single description does not provide a complete assessment of a product.
What additional information can the manufacturer provide?
Define the use you need first. Then collect information on composition, performance, maintenance, and disposal. Record missing information rather than treating it as a positive or negative finding.
Are these products being compared for the same use and conditions?